Characterization of recombinant IgA producing CHO cell lines by qPCR

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) mediates a key role in mucosal immunity and is a promising novel immunotherapeutic candidate. However, difficulties in obtaining enough material often hamper in vivo explorations. We have previously generated recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines which expressed two different HIV-1 antibodies, 3D6 and 4B3, as IgA1 [1]. One cell line (3D6-IgA) shows high production rates, whereas the other (4B3-IgA) secretes rather low amounts of product. In order to unravel the mystery of productivity bottlenecks we extensively characterized the cell lines regarding growth rate, IgA productivity in long-term culture, immunofluorescence microscopy, flow cytometry and Western blotting of intraand extracellular product (data not shown). The generated data encouraged us to analyze whether the observed antibody productivities could be explained by gene copy number (GCN) or mRNA levels. Materials and methods CHO host (ATCC CRL-9096) and recombinant cell lines [1] were cultivated in spinner vessels (Techne, UK) with 50 mL medium (ProCHO5, Switzerland), at 37°C and 50 rpm. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated from 2 × 10 cells using the DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Netherlands) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Quantification was performed spectrophotometrically at an absorbance of 260 nm and the purity was determined by measuring the ratio at 260 nm and 280 nm. gDNA samples were stored at 4°C. Cellular RNA was isolated from 5 × 10 cells using the Ambion Tri Reagent Solution (Life Technologies, CA) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. To remove DNA contaminations from extracted RNA the preparation was digested with 3 U DNase I (Qiagen, Netherlands) for 30 min at RT together with 160 U RNase inhibitor (Life Technologies, CA) and then inactivated for 10 min at 75°C before another RNA precipitation step. Purified total RNA was dissolved in 25 μl RNase free water containing 60 U RNase inhibitor. cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription. 1.5 μg RNA, 1 μg random primers (Promega, WI) and 12.5 nmol dNTPs (New England Biolabs, MA) were incubated in a reaction volume of 14 μl for 5 min at 70°C and 2 min at room temperature. Then, 40 U RNase inhibitor, 200 U M-MLV reverse transcriptase and buffer (both Promega, WI) were added to a reaction volume of 20 μl and incubated for 30 min at 37°C before denaturation for 5 min at 95°C. Real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis was performed on a MiniOpticon qPCR device (Biorad, CA). Primers and the fluorogenic hydrolysis probes were synthesized by Sigma (MO). Same primers and probes were used for the analysis of gDNA and cDNA. The reaction mix included iQ Supermix (Biorad, CA), 6 pmol primer and 4 pmol hydrolysis probe for HC, JC and ß-actin quantification or 12 pmol primer and 8 pmol hydrolysis probe for LC determination in 20 μl reaction volume. 3 ng pre-denatured (99°C, 10 min) gDNA or 3 μL cDNA from a 1:50 dilution of the reverse transcription reaction was used directly for qPCR. Negative controls (NC), no template controls (NTC) and no reverse transcriptase controls (NRT) for transcript analysis were included in each run. The quantification cycle (Cq) was determined by linear regression and baseline subtraction using the * Correspondence: [email protected] Vienna Institute of BioTechnology, Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 11, 1190 Vienna, Austria Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Reinhart et al. BMC Proceedings 2013, 7(Suppl 6):P114 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/7/S6/P114 © 2013 Reinhart et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. CFX Manager (Biorad, CA). The mean qPCR efficiencies for HC, LC, JC and ß-actin were calculated from raw fluorescence data using the LinRegPCR software application, V12.17 [2]. Quantification was done by relative quantification with efficiency correction [3] using ß-actin as internal reference and expressed as ratios. Results and discussion qPCR was performed in six technical replicates. The Cq values and calculated efficiencies were well reproducible (Table 1). gDNA analysis revealed an overall higher exogenic GCN for the low producer 4B3-IgA than for 3D6-IgA (Figure 1). On the genomic level clone 4B3-IgA Table 1 Calculated efficiencies (E), Cq and ΔCq values and copies relative to ß-actin for gDNA and cDNA derived from clones 3D6-IgA and 4B3-IgA GOI Target Clone Cq max. SD [%] E SD (%) ΔCq ß-actin Copies relative to ß-actin ß-actin gDNA 3D6-IgA 24.60 0.20 2.07 2.22 n/a n/a 4B3-IgA 24.21 0.14 2.07 2.22 n/a n/a cDNA 3D6-IgA 18.52 0.13 2.03 0.43 n/a n/a 4B3-IgA 16.25 0.63 2.04 1.33 n/a n/a HC gDNA 3D6-IgA 23.56 0.16 1.95 3.32 -1.03 8.28 4B3-IgA 22.11 0.14 1.95 3.32 -2.11 16.44 cDNA 3D6-IgA 21.78 0.17 1.91 1.35 3.26 0.38 4B3-IgA 19.50 0.68 1.97 1.53 3.25 0.20 JC gDNA 3D6-IgA 24.81 0.03 1.95 0.94 0.22 3.80 4B3-IgA 22.77 0.10 1.95 0.94 -1.44 11.20 cDNA 3D6-IgA 24.52 0.23 1.82 0.87 5.97 0.22 4B3-IgA 20.81 1.54 1.96 0.27 4.56 0.10 LC gDNA 3D6-IgA 24.90 0.14 2.05 0.59 0.31 0.98 4B3-IgA 21.50 0.21 2.11 1.21 -2.71 4.40 cDNA 3D6-IgA 20.26 0.20 1.88 0.75 1.73 1.30 4B3-IgA 15.02 2.36 1.98 1.30 -1.22 3.93 Figure 1 Gene copy number and transcript level of recombinant clones expressing 3D6-IgA or 4B3-IgA. The abundance of LC ( ), JC ( ) and HC ( ) genes was calculated relative to ß-actin. Reinhart et al. BMC Proceedings 2013, 7(Suppl 6):P114 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1753-6561/7/S6/P114 Page 2 of 3